
The past, present, and future of digital privacy for youth and children: Part II
In the second of two posts, Leslie Regan Shade, Monica Jean Henderson, and Katie Mackinnon explore research on children’s and youth’s experiences of online spaces, their needs for privacy protection, and how conceptions of digital tools and the corporations that make them can be better informed through digital literacy.
The past, present, and future of digital privacy for youth and children: Part I
In the first of two posts, Leslie Regan Shade, Monica Jean Henderson, and Katie Mackinnon explore the implications of Bill C-11 in terms of impacts on digital privacy for youth and children. The authors reflect on the need to balance online risks and opportunities for minors in the context of their research with The eQuality Project.
Agency, goals, and perspective: how do natural or artificial agents understand the world?
When we say that something is good or bad, is that a claim about objective facts, or something dependent on our perspective? Guest blogger Cory Travers Lewis reflects on Denis Walsh’s way of thinking about norms—one which treats them as both objective facts and as dependent on the perspective of particular living things.
Marlène Koffi: Canada’s internet connection is lagging
In a new op-ed for The Globe and Mail, SRI Faculty Affiliate Marlène Koffi explains how Canada’s ongoing internet-connection crisis has highlighted many existing social inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic. To correct this, Koffi argues government must update its data collection methods and invest in public-private partnerships.
Moving away from AI ethics as “window-dressing” to scientifically informed policies
SRI Graduate Fellow Shabnam Haghzare reflects on Joanna J. Bryson’s seminar about AI ethics, AI as human-authored tool, and the need for AI regulation in the service of public good. Bryson is professor of ethics and technology at the Hertie School in Berlin.
Gillian K. Hadfield: Regulatory technologies can solve the problem of AI
“How do we adapt our systems of rules to keep up with social and economic change?” Gillian K. Hadfield contributes to The Toronto Star’s Saturday Debate, exploring whether or not we should fear artificial intelligence and describing the regulatory technologies that are required to help us keep AI in check.
SRI and the Rockefeller Foundation partner on building solutions for AI governance
AI governance is urgently needed to ensure that its benefits to humanity outweigh its risks of causing harm. AI governance can also help evolve our legal and regulatory systems so they do not impede innovation. “Innovating AI Governance: Bold Action and Novel Approaches” is an ongoing series of workshops developed by SRI in collaboration with the Rockefeller Foundation to address this problem.
SRI graduate fellows invite submissions for 2021 Grad Workshop, “Views on Techno-Utopia”
“Views on Techno-Utopia” will bring together early career scholars in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities to follow the promises and perils of emerging technologies—particularly AI, platforms, and surveillance tech—through the lens of techno-utopianism. Learn more about the 2021 SRI Grad Workshop, including description, submission instructions, dates and deadlines, and more.
Why we should regulate information about persons, not “personal information”
SRI privacy experts propose a shift to regulating “information about persons” provides better architecture to rethink contemporary privacy risks and develop a data governance framework suited to the 21st century. Part of an ongoing series of commentaries on the features, implications, and controversies surrounding privacy law reforms in an increasingly digital and data-rich context.
Nisarg Shah named one of “AI’s 10 To Watch” for innovative work in computational social choice
SRI Faculty Affiliate and Fellow Nisarg Shah has been named one of 10 outstanding young scholars to watch in the field of artificial intelligence by IEEE Intelligent Systems. Situated at the intersection of AI and economics, Shah’s research on computational social choice examines the theoretical foundations of fairness in algorithmic decision-making.
SRI Director Gillian Hadfield joins Long Run Initiative’s board of governors
The Long Run Initiative convenes experts from across sectors to tackle contemporary challenges in economics, public policy, business, and society. The LRI’s board of governors is now joined by SRI Director Gillian K. Hadfield, a scholar of law and economics whose work on innovating legal markets and improving access to justice has had a seminal influence across academic disciplines.
Privacy regulation and competition: do we risk solidifying the dominance of big corporations?
Canada’s Bill C-11 is a welcome update in protecting the privacy of Canadians. But privacy is not free. Privacy regulations are shown to inhibit innovation, increase inequality, and hurt competition. Will privacy law reforms further entrench the dominant market positions of big players like Google? Avi Goldfarb explores the implications on the Schwartz Reisman blog.